Mandates
-
Joseph Lebovic Charitable Foundation v. Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto, 2024 ONCA 933
Successfully quashing a motion brought by donor seeking leave to appeal from the Superior Court of Justice’s dismissal of the donor’s challenge of an arbitrator’s jurisdiction motion decision.
-
2100 Bridletowne Inc. v. Ding, 2021 ONSC 2119
Counsel to a builder/vendor seeking a mandatory injunction against defaulting purchasers to provide vacant possession of a condominium townhouse.
-
Aylmer Meat Packers Inc. v. Ontario, 2022 ONCA 579; leave to SCC denied
Successfully represented plaintiff in Ontario Court of Appeal reversing trial judgment, first imposition of private law duty of care on regulator exercising statutory authority.
-
Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 and Bell Canada v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 66
Counsel for intervener Council of Canadian Administrative Tribunals regarding standard of review in administrative law.
-
McDonald v. Home Capital Group
Acted for a Director and Officer of Home Capital before the OSC and with respect to a shareholder class action brought against Home Capital and some of its directors and officers seeking $200 million …
-
Representing a hospital in a professional negligence and occupier’s liability claim
-
Huszti Holdings v. YQG, 2017 ONCA 708 and 2016 ONSC 8130
Successfully represented an applicant seeking to clear an easement in favour of the Windsor airport. (2017 ONCA 708 and 2016 ONSC 8130)
-
P. (D.) v. Wagg, 71 O.R. (3d) 229 (Ontario Court of Appeal)
Successfully represented physician in barring automatic production of crown brief in civil proceedings.
-
Blocked a multi-million dollar claim relating to a failed airplane purchase agreement against the Republic of Estonia on the basis of the State Immunity Act
-
Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740
Successfully represented plaintiff in Ontario Court of Appeal in motor vehicle fatality, admissibility of expert testimony under Insurance Act Regulation.
-
Large Private Equity Firm's Claim Against the Federal Government
Acting for a large PE firm against the federal government for negligent misrepresentation and other torts arising out of the government’s involvement in the wireless telecommunications industry.
-
Energy Fundamentals Group Inc. v. Veresen Inc., 2015 ONSC 692, 2015 ONCA 514
Counsel to Energy Fundamentals Group Inc., a boutique investment bank, in litigation against Veresen Inc., the owner and developer of a multi-billion dollar liquid natural gas facility in Oregon.