Pro Bono and Public Interest

Pro Bono 

Elite law firms have a duty to maintain a robust pro bono practice in service of the rule of law, civil liberties and the disadvantaged. Our pro bono practice is best in class. Here are a selection of pro bono and public interest mandates on which our lawyers have acted.

Liberty and Personal Security

  • TNG Logo

    The Neighbourhood Group et al. v. HMKRO 2025

    Counsel to a community charity and provider of supervised consumption services in a constitutional challenge to a Community Care and Recovery Act, 2024, which imposes a ban on the operation of supervised consumption sites. We obtained an injunction that will allow supervised consumption sites to remain open, despite an Ontario law that would have required the immediate closure of 10 sites across the province. (2025 ONSC 1934)

  • CCLA - Canadian Civil Liberties

    Canadian Civil Liberties Association

    Francis v. Ontario

    Counsel to the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) in the Ontario Court of Appeal upholding the common law distinction between policy and operational decisions in tort law governing public authorities. (2021 ONCA 197)

    R. v. Kloubakov

    Counsel to the CCLA at the Supreme Court of Canada, constitutionality of criminal prohibitions surrounding sex work.

    R. v. Zora

    Counsel to the CCLA in the Supreme Court of Canada, whether mens rea for the offence of failure to comply with conditions of undertaking or recognizance is assessed on subjective or objective standard. (2020 SCC 14)

    Canadian Civil Liberties Association v. Canada

    Counsel to the CCLA in Ontario Court of Appeal striking down the solitary confinement provisions of the federal Correctional Services Act as constituting cruel and unusual treatment or punishment. (2019 ONCA 2432017 ONSC 7491; and 2017 ONSC 4191

  • CACCN logo

    Cuthbertson v. Rasouli

    Counsel to the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses in Supreme Court of Canada, whether physicians have the discretion to withdraw life support over the objections of patient’s family.  (2013 SCC 53)

  • Nurses Associations

    Canada (Attorney General) v. PHS Community Services Society

    Counsel to nurses associations in Supreme Court of Canada, lawful operation of safe injection site in Vancouver’s Downtown East Side. (2011 SCC 44)

  • Womens Crisis Services of Waterloo Region

    Women’s Crisis Services of Waterloo Region v. Reid’s Heritage Construction Ltd. et al.

    Counsel to the Women’s Crisis Services of Waterloo Region in the Superior Court of Justice in an action for damages arising from construction and building deficiencies affecting the women’s shelter located at Haven House.

Administration of Justice

  • ADR Institute of Canada and Toronto Commercial Arbitration Society logos

    Aroma Franchise Company, Inc. v. Aroma Espresso Bar Canada Inc.

    Counsel to ADR Institute of Canada and Toronto Commercial Arbitration Society in Ontario Court of Appeal, arbitrators’ duties of disclosure, independence and impartiality. (2024 ONCA 839)

  • CMLA logo

    Ahmad v. Peel Regional Police Services Board

    Counsel to Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association in Superior Court of Justice, resisting publication ban in police shooting, open court principle. (2024 ONSC 2474

  • CANLII logo

    Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc.

    Counsel to Canadian Legal Information Institute in Supreme Court of Canada, interpretation and scope of the Crown copyright provisions of the Copyright Act. (2019 SCC 43)

  • CCLA - Canadian Civil Liberties

    Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd. v. Canada

    Counsel to the Canadian Civil Liberties Association in Supreme Court of Canada, constitutionality of publication bans in bail proceedings. (2010 SCC 21)

Privacy Rights

  • CCLA - Canadian Civil Liberties

    Canadian Civil Liberties Association

    R. v. Cole

    Counsel to Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) in Supreme Court of Canada, expectation of privacy in employer-owned computers. (2012 SCC 53)

    R. v. Jarvis

    Counsel to CCLA in Supreme Court of Canada, voyeurism provisions of the Criminal Code. (2019 SCC 10)

    R. v. Patrick

    Counsel to CCLA in Supreme Court of Canada, establishing constitutionally protected expectation of privacy in household garbage. (2009 SCC 17)

    R. v. A.M.; R. v. Kang-Brown; R. v. A. M.

    Counsel to CCLA in Supreme Court of Canada, striking down random sniffer dog searches of students and their backpacks. (2008 SCC 192008 SCC 182006 CanLII 13550 (ON CA))

Search and Seizure

  • CCLA - Canadian Civil Liberties

    Canadian Civil Liberties Association

    R. v. Ramelson

    Counsel to CCLA in Supreme Court of Canada, entrapment doctrine in digital spaces. (2022 SCC 44)

    R. v. Le

    Counsel to CCLA in Supreme Court of Canada, meaning of arbitrary detention. (2019 SCC 34)

    R. v. Clayton

    Counsel to CCLA in Supreme Court of Canada, constitutionality of police roadblocks in emergencies. (2007 SCC 32)

Equality Rights

  • CCLA - Canadian Civil Liberties

    Mathur v. Ontario

    Counsel to CCLA in Ontario Court of Appeal, constitutional challenge of carbon emissions reduction target. (2024 ONCA 762)

  • Applicant

    Whearty v. Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care

    Counsel in judicial review of Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision disqualifying counsel. (2024 ONSC 5638)

Hate Speech

  • Plaintiff

    Soliman v. Bordman

    Counsel to plaintiff in Superior Court of Justice, precedent-setting defamation case, Islamophobic speech. (2021 ONSC 7023)

  • Plaintiff

    Paramount Fine Foods v. Kevin J. Johnston

    Counsel to plaintiff in a defamation action, award of $2.5 million, Islamophobic hate speech, 18-month prison sentence for contempt. (2019 ONSC 29102021 ONSC 6558)

Consumer Protection

  • Defendant

    Ferrone v. One Dealer Financial Services Inc.

    Counsel to an individual defending a claim from a door-to-door HVAC financing company asserting a security interest in her home, achieved favourable settlement for the customer/homeowner.

  • Plaintiff

    Foster v. Canadian Home Improvement Credit Corporation et al

    Counsel to an individual homeowner pursuing a claim against door-to-door appliance retailers for misrepresentation, rescission of rental contracts, and deletion of registered security interests against the homeowner’s property, achieved a favourable settlement for the homeowner.