LOLG Successfully Defends Rogers’ $26 Billion Acquisition of Shaw
Overview
On January 24, 2023, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from a landmark decision of the Competition Tribunal dismissing an application from the Commissioner of Competition to block the Rogers' acquisition of Shaw Communications Inc.—one of the largest telecommunications merger in Canadian history. LOLG acted for Rogers before the Tribunal and the Federal Court of Appeal.
In reasons totalling 80 pages in length, the Competition Tribunal concluded that the transaction—which includes the sale of Freedom Mobile to Quebec-based Videotron—will enhance and promote competition in both wireline (Internet, cable television and home phone) and wireless (cell phone) markets across Canada. This decision was the culmination of an intense trial process, during which the Tribunal heard from over 40 lay and expert witnesses on a tight chess-clock, with nearly 2,000 documentary exhibits. Having found that the Commissioner did not discharge his burden of proving that the transaction will substantially lessen competition, the Tribunal found it unnecessary to consider Rogers’ efficiencies defence.
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the Commissioner’s appeal, which alleged several legal errors in the Tribunal’s decision. The unanimous panel found those allegations to be “without merit”, and concluded that the Tribunal’s findings and determinations were “unshakeable”. The Commissioner confirmed that he will not seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, bringing a formal end to his legal challenge.
The decisions establish important precedents for merger review and litigation, particularly surrounding the burden borne by the Commissioner, s. 92 of the Competition Act. It is also an example of a rigorous review of price and non-price effects arising from a merger under s. 93 of the Competition Act, including in its review of expert evidence.
This case was heard on a highly expedited basis. With close case management of the Tribunal’s Chair, Justice Andrew Little, and the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Canada, Paul Crampton, this matter was expedited from pleadings to final decision in less than eight months with a full discover process and several contested motions. The Commissioner’s appeal was also expedited by the Federal Court of Appeal’s senior puisne judge, Justice David Stratas, which was expedited to a decision less than four weeks after the Commissioner served his Notice of Appeal.
The decisions are available at the links below.
People
-
Passionate about his work and deeply knowledgeable in commercial litigation, Brad delivers strategic and creative legal solutions that are grounded in business realities.
-
Zain is a business-minded litigator who combines smart advocacy with practical problem-solving. Clients count on Zain’s sharp focus and strategic insight to guide them through their most challenging s…
-
John Carlo is a methodical litigator who enjoys tackling complex legal problems. He delivers solutions that are innovative, analytical and results driven.
Expertise
News & Insights
-
Paul Fruitman in the Advocates’ Journal
Paul Fruitman writes about language, perception and persuasion in the Winter Edition of The Advocates' Journal. To read the article, click here: https://bit.ly/4pHrPgj
-
Nadia Campion appointed to The Advocates' Society Board of Directors
Congratulations to Nadia Campion, on her appointment as a Board Member of The Advocates' Society. Nadia is widely respected for her deep industry knowledge and extensive trial experience.&n…
-
LOLG Obtains Mareva Order in Family Law Case Freezing Assets up to $20 million
In Montesano v Montesano, Rahool Agarwal, Philip Underwood and Amethyst Haighton successfully obtained a Mareva order for their client, the Applicant, in furtherance of her family law application. Jus…