Mandates
-
Wireless Carrier in Litigation Against the Federal Government
Representing investors in a wireless carrier in litigation against the federal government.
-
2405416 Ontario Inc. v. 2405490 Ontario Limited- 2016 ONCA 686, 2016 ONSC 3893
Successfully represented a commercial tenant in a dispute with the landlord over the right to purchase the property. Tenant successful both on application and on appeal brought by landlord.
-
Successfully represented CEO of private corporation in dispute concerning a constructive dismissal from employment
-
Matthiessen et al v. Mondex ONSC 2024
Successfully represented heirs recovering Chagall painting purloined by Nazis.
-
Acting for individual investors bringing a claim against the majority owner of a private company for negligent and/or fraudulent misrepresentation
-
Successfully represented a group of school bus companies in a multi-million dollar arbitration over damages for past breaches of contract and to set the terms of a future contract
-
ThyssenKrupp Industrial Services Inc. v. DBS Hearn et al., 2016 ONSC 3558
Successfully defended an automotive logistics company in connection with an injunction brought by a multinational corporation.
-
Van Dyke v. Grey Bruce Regional Health Centre, 2005 CanLII 18841 (ON CA)
Successfully represented physician in Ontario Court of Appeal overturning trial judgment in gentamicin toxicity test case, test for causation in medical negligence.
-
Successfully represented trustees in seeking a foreign court’s approval for a multi-million dollar transaction
-
University of Toronto (Governing Council) v. Doe et al., 2024 ONSC 3755
Counsel to student organization in successfully intervening in motion for injunction regarding protest encampment at the University of Toronto.
-
977230 Alberta Ltd. v. Boire
After having resisted the respondents’ application to convert the petition proceeding into an action and thereby eliminating a number of issues between the parties on a summary basis, obtained judgmen…
-
Acting for a purchaser of a large commercial building in Sudbury in an action seeking $5 million in damages from the seller for concealment of hidden defects in the building