Court Of Appeal Allows Appeal In Franchise Case With Important Precedential Value
Overview
Jonathan Lisus and James Renihan successfully appealed a decision striking out a claim brought by a group of Toronto-area General Motors dealers against the U.S.-based parent company of General Motors of Canada. The Ontario Court of Appeal concluded that the Plaintiffs’ claim raised issues concerning the scope of a franchisor’s duty of good faith, for which there was limited jurisprudence. The Court agreed with the Plaintiffs that the scope of General Motors’ obligations to the Plaintiffs should be determined at trial, noting that the case would likely have “important precedential value”. The Court agreed that franchise legislation must be interpreted generously to achieve its aims of protecting franchisees. Read the decision here. http://www.ontariocourts.ca/decisions/2016/2016ONCA0324.htm
People
-
Clients rely on Jonathan to handle their most difficult problems. He “has our utmost trust on critical matters” (Chambers Canada 2023). “Jonathan Lisus is in a class of his own”, “He is one of the bes…
Expertise
News & Insights
-
Lexpert Special Edition: Infrastructure 2026
LOLG lawyers are recognized among Canada’s leading infrastructure lawyers in the Lexpert Special Edition: Infrastructure 2026.
-
Benchmark Litigation Canada Awards 2026
We are honoured to have won four prestigious awards at the Benchmark Litigation Canada Awards 2026.
-
LOLG Reaches Proposed Settlement in National Class Action Against Aviva
On March 9, 2026, the parties in Nordik Windows Inc et al v Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, CV-20-00643386-00CP, reached a proposed settlement of the certified national class action concerning busi…