Court Of Appeal Allows Appeal In Franchise Case With Important Precedential Value
Overview
Jonathan Lisus and James Renihan successfully appealed a decision striking out a claim brought by a group of Toronto-area General Motors dealers against the U.S.-based parent company of General Motors of Canada. The Ontario Court of Appeal concluded that the Plaintiffs’ claim raised issues concerning the scope of a franchisor’s duty of good faith, for which there was limited jurisprudence. The Court agreed with the Plaintiffs that the scope of General Motors’ obligations to the Plaintiffs should be determined at trial, noting that the case would likely have “important precedential value”. The Court agreed that franchise legislation must be interpreted generously to achieve its aims of protecting franchisees. Read the decision here. http://www.ontariocourts.ca/decisions/2016/2016ONCA0324.htm
People
-
Clients rely on Jonathan to handle their most difficult problems. He “has our utmost trust on critical matters” (Chambers Canada 2023). “Jonathan Lisus is in a class of his own”, “He is one of the bes…
Expertise
News & Insights
-
Paul Fruitman in the Advocates’ Journal
Paul Fruitman writes about language, perception and persuasion in the Winter Edition of The Advocates' Journal. To read the article, click here: https://bit.ly/4pHrPgj
-
Nadia Campion appointed to The Advocates' Society Board of Directors
Congratulations to Nadia Campion, on her appointment as a Board Member of The Advocates' Society. Nadia is widely respected for her deep industry knowledge and extensive trial experience.&n…
-
LOLG Obtains Mareva Order in Family Law Case Freezing Assets up to $20 million
In Montesano v Montesano, Rahool Agarwal, Philip Underwood and Amethyst Haighton successfully obtained a Mareva order for their client, the Applicant, in furtherance of her family law application. Jus…