Mandates

Back

  • Kazemi Estate v. Islamic Republic of Iran

    Counsel to REDRESS Trust in the Supreme Court of Canada in a case involving the right to sue foreign governments for torture.

  • Bakaris v. Southern Sky, 2020 ONSC 7306

    Counsel to a Zimbabwean business owner in the cannabis industry on a motion to resolve jurisdictional issues due to conflicting terms in an agreement.

  • Acting for a seller of commercial property in an action brought by a purchaser alleging misrepresentation respecting lot size of the property

  • Ontario Professional Fire Fighters’ Association v. Atkinson et al.

    Counsel to the Plaintiff in a fraud claim against two former members orchestrated a scheme whereby they duped the widows of deceased fire fighters into directing money to the former members.

  • Intermarket CAM Limited v. Ursula Weiss et al.

    Counsel to applicant in a successful unjust enrichment application against property vendors in an agreement of purchase and sale for lands in Cambridge, Ontario.

  • Counsel to an auto parts manufacturer in ongoing litigation concerning a shareholder oppression action

  • McDonald v. Home Capital Group Inc.

    Represented Home Capital Group Inc. and related entities defending a class action alleging secondary market misrepresentation.

  • Bakaris v. Southern Sky, 2020 ONSC 7306

    Counsel to a Zimbabwean business owner in the cannabis industry on a motion to resolve jurisdictional issues due to conflicting terms in an agreement.

  • Judicial Review of a Ontario Municipal Board Decision

    Successfully defended an application seeking judicial review of a Ontario Municipal Board decision approving a large-scale development.

  • Conducting an independent review of documents for privilege for a large multinational corporation

  • Successfully represented a developer in a dispute with a co-developer over the interpretation of a cost sharing agreement and ownership of properties in the community development

  • Represented The Advocates’ Society in the Supreme Court of Canada in the Groia case involving the interpretation of the “Civility Rules” of The Law Society of Ontario