Mandates
-
Urban Outdoor Trans Ad v. Scarborough (City), 2001 CanLII 24140 (ON CA)
Successfully represented City of Toronto in Ontario Court of Appeal in constitutional challenge to municipal bylaws restricting use of mobile signs and billboards.
-
Successfully defended the National Hockey League in a claim brought by Labatt Brewing Company concerning an alleged obligation to continue negotiating a renewal of a multi-million dollar sponsorship agreement
-
One of the Largest Cross-Border Commercial Litigation and Insolvency Mandates in Recent History
Counsel to the Sackler Families in the Purdue Pharma CCAA proceeding, a proposed national class action, and two proposed class actions brought by the First Nations and Municipalities across Canada.
-
Counsel to a distributor of retail products in connection with a claim for wrongful dismissal and breach of privacy
-
Arbitral Award On Behalf of a Major Pharmaceutical Distribution Company
Successfully obtained a $12 million dollar arbitral award on behalf of a major pharmaceutical distribution company after a 10-day private arbitration.
-
U.K. Insurance Arbitration
Successfully represented a client in a U.K. insurance arbitration arising from alleged defects in one of Canada’s biggest construction projects.
-
Precedent-setting constitutional challenge of law in returning Greenbelt lands
Counsel to large landowner in proceedings against the Ontario government regarding the inclusion of land inside the Greenbelt.
-
Counsel to a Leading Land Developer with a Dispute Over a Cost-Sharing Agreement
-
SCM Insurances Services Inc. v. Medisys Corporate Health LP, 2014 ONSC 2632
Counsel in the successful opposition to injunctive relief sought in the context of a corporate transaction.
-
Covalon Technologies v. Abbasian et al.
Counsel to a healthcare innovation company in a civil action and injunction proceedings against a former company executive who is alleged to have stolen trade secrets and intellectual property in an e…
-
1582235 Ontario Limited v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 1279
Represented physicians, mandamus order against Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care ordering return of funds wrongfully taken in breach of Health Insurance Plan and Health Insurance Act.
-
Acted for successful defendants in a trial in which the plaintiffs sought $13.5 million for an alleged breach of a financing agreement. Claim dismissed in its entirety, with costs to the defendants